Customer area
London 020 7822 4000
Brighton 01273 838734
Month: October 2018
You are here: Home / 2018 / October / Page 2
searchSearch
call-answerCall Us
new-email-envelopeEnquiry
list-menuMenu
×
×
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    • ×

    Archive for October, 2018

    You are here: Home / 2018 / October / Page 2
    magnifying glass over an employment contract

    Employment Status And Intellectual Property

    23rd October 2018 by

    In a case concerning ownership of intellectual property (Sprint Electric Limited v Buyer’s Dream Limited), although neither of the parties called into question the description of the employment relationship between them, the High Court found that ‘where…the Court has concerns that the labels that the parties have chosen to apply to their relationship are untrue or inaccurate, and have been applied as a device to avoid the payment of taxes that are properly due, the Court can and should consider the issue of its own motion’. Continue reading →

    23rd October 2018 0 Comments Employment law blog posts
    Auto insurance policy signature. Home owners insurance paperwork.

    Insurer Cannot Dodge Liability Because Driver Fails To Cooperate

    23rd October 2018 by

    Insurance is a legal requirement for any driver in the UK and that is why insurance policies cover drivers, not the cars they drive. Since insurance companies will always seek to minimise the amount they pay out on claims, there are often lively arguments about who was responsible for an accident, and to what extent, especially where there is more than one driver involved. Continue reading →

    23rd October 2018 0 Comments Personal injury blog posts
    Hand, two men on a desk. Negotiating business.

    Using A General Civil Restraint Order Against Vexatious Litigant

    22nd October 2018 by

    Healys acted for the Trustee in Bankruptcy of Ms H,  who was the subject of a bankruptcy order made in 2010 on the petition of the supervisor of her Individual Voluntary Arrangement (“IVA”). The IVA had been entered into by Ms H in 2003 as a means of annulling a previous bankruptcy order made in 2000. However, the supervisor petitioned for her bankruptcy on her failure to comply with the terms of her IVA.   Continue reading →

    22nd October 2018 0 Comments Insolvency