The construction negligence protocol and claims in contract and tort
If you are considering a claim for compensation because of the professional negligence of a construction contractor, you should be aware that there is a protocol for all construction and engineering disputes – including for work performed by architects and quantity surveyors.
The protocol is approved by the courts and aims to facilitate the early exchange of evidence between disputing parties so that expensive and lengthy litigation can be avoided – correct use of the protocol can also help clarify which matters are crucial to a dispute and thereby reduce the amount of time wasted on distractions and extraneous issues.
The majority of professional negligence construction claims which are brought in front of a judge come before the Technology and Construction Court. There are many advantages to having a specialist court division to hear these cases, not least because they are incredibly well-versed in all the legal and technical issues which are often critical to a claim’s outcome.
For example, judges have in-depth and specialised knowledge of important pieces of relevant legislation such as the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 1994, the Defective Premises Act 1972, and the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
Where appropriate, cases may be referred for court-enforceable adjudication. Although these are cheaper and less time-consuming than court proceedings, they are still binding and should always be treated as such. Continue reading →