Healys’ Commercial Litigation Group are experts in dispute resolution. We resolve disputes on behalf of our clients by understanding the best means of achieving our clients’ aims. In the vast majority of cases, this will be to conclude matters as quickly and as cost effectively as possible. However, there may be other commercial considerations affecting strategy.
Our Commercial Litigation Group is a professional unit providing an excellent service. All of the Fee Earners in the Group have a high degree of technical ability which enables each of them to create commercial and pragmatic solutions.
We aim to resolve disputes on behalf of our clients as quickly and cost-effectively as possible. We always seek to provide value for money. We litigate of course but we also engage in all forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and particularly mediation.
We offer a variety of different types of retainer, many of which involve us sharing with you the risk of the dispute, such as conditional and contingency fee agreements. We also offer fixed fees, capped fees and discounted fees to assist you in the management of the cost of litigation and to provide as much certainty as possible in respect of those costs.
We provide regular costs updates and work within budgets. We aim to keep our clients updated at all times and work within deadlines. We focus on and specialise in acting for small to medium sized commercial clients who require advice on complex and high-value litigation matters.
Our Dispute Resolution Team and Partner, Robert Johnson, have been recognised with a number of awards to include:
Additionally, Healys Dispute Resolution team is recommended by the Legal 500 as one of the top commercial litigation practices in the UK; with Head of Dispute Resolution David Bailey and partner Nicholas Taylor both ranked as Recommended Lawyers.
14th August 2023
In this blog post, award winning Lawyer, Partner & Head of Professional Negligence, Robert Johnson shares insights into the potential advantages in bringing a claim against a solicitor or other professional. Continue reading »
29th July 2023
David Bailey considers the impact on litigation funding following the Supreme Court decision of R (on the application of PACCAR Inc and others) (Appellants) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and others (Respondents) – Press Summary (supremecourt.uk) handed down on 26 July 2023.
12th July 2023
UK Recommended Lawyer & media specialist, Nicholas Taylor explores why the media have not identified the BBC’s suspended TV presenter. Continue reading »
14th April 2023
We are pleased to announce that Robert Johnson, Partner and Head of Healys Professional Negligence, has been identified as a leader in his field and recommended for inclusion in this year’s Who’s Who Legal: Professional Negligence report. Continue reading »
16th March 2023
Professional Negligence Partner, Robert Johnson provides a guide to assist you explore your potential negligence claim. Continue reading »
14th August 2023
In this blog post, award winning Lawyer, Partner & Head of Professional Negligence, Robert Johnson shares insights into the potential advantages in bringing a claim against a solicitor or other professional. Continue reading »
29th July 2023
David Bailey considers the impact on litigation funding following the Supreme Court decision of R (on the application of PACCAR Inc and others) (Appellants) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and others (Respondents) – Press Summary (supremecourt.uk) handed down on 26 July 2023.
12th July 2023
UK Recommended Lawyer & media specialist, Nicholas Taylor explores why the media have not identified the BBC’s suspended TV presenter. Continue reading »
14th April 2023
We are pleased to announce that Robert Johnson, Partner and Head of Healys Professional Negligence, has been identified as a leader in his field and recommended for inclusion in this year’s Who’s Who Legal: Professional Negligence report. Continue reading »
16th March 2023
Professional Negligence Partner, Robert Johnson provides a guide to assist you explore your potential negligence claim. Continue reading »